强调句型和形式主语
2024-11-15 13:36:03 学考宝 作者:佚名
问题描述
问个问题:
Everyone agrees that it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
如果把强调句型里的 that 换成 what 作主语从句说的通吗?从句意和语法角度说的通吗?
对了,这句话的原译文是:大家一致认为正是您在那个紧要关头的快速反应带来了令人满意的结果。
老师答疑
陈老师:
问个问题:
Everyone agrees that it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
如果把强调句型里的 that 换成 what 作主语从句说的通吗?从句意和语法角度说的通吗?
回答如下,强调句型中It is/was +强调内容+that/who+其它,如果强调主语是人还可以用who。但是不能使用what,因为what 在从句具有先行词+关系代词的双重身份。
对了,这句话的原译文是:大家一致认为正是您在那个紧要关头的快速反应带来了令人满意的结果。
回答如下:
以上语法结构为:
主语+谓语+连词that引导的宾语从句,其宾语从句又嵌套一个强调句型结构it was+强调内容+that,(即并与宾语从句是由一个强调句型结构充当) 强调句型中所强调内容为主语成分。
语法语法结构分析如下
主语:Everyone(每个人;大家)
谓语:agrees(赞同,同意;认同)
引导宾语从句连词:that
宾语从句:it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
(是在那紧急情况下的快速反应倒装了这个满意的结果)
宾语从句语法结构分析如下
主语:your quick-witted response in that emergency(在那种紧急情况下你的聪明机智的/敏捷的反应/回应)
谓语:has led to (导致了/产生了/造就了/引起了)
宾语:this satisfactory outcome (这个满意的结果)
It was +强调内容+that has led to this satsifactory outcome
强调内容为主语:your quick-witted response in that emergency
备注:主语:名词短语+后置定语修饰
(1)quick-witted adj.聪明机智的;机敏的
(2)in that emergency 在那种紧急情况下.(为介词短语作后置定语修饰前面的名词"response")
强调句型:it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
在强调句型中,如果去掉it was ...that 后句子意思没有任何影响。如果有影响就不是强调句结构
【参考译文】大家/每个人都认同是他在那种紧急情况下的聪明机智反应导致了这个令人满意的结果.
用what作主语从句就是要有代词和先行词功能啊,而且前面正好剩下强调句的it作形式主语,在句意和语法上说不通吗?
继续跟踪回答如下:
我的意思是说,可以强调what 引导的从句,但是以上句子不可以改为what,
It was what you said that made her so angry.(强调内容为WHAT 引导的主语从句)
What was it that made her so angry ?
(强调句结构为特殊疑问句形式.)
When was it that you paid the money to me?
(特殊疑问句形式)
Who was it that took away my pen ?(特殊疑问句结构)
Was it Tom who borrowed a book from you ?(一般疑问句性)
还有一种强调就是直接以what引导主语从句放在句首,结构如下
what sb do sth is .....结构
What Tom wants to do is a good rest.
What I need are five books.
希望这次你能明白,并采纳,谢谢!
我就是想问为啥不能换成what?换句话说就是把强调句that换成what后,句子哪里有问题?
继续跟踪回答
不能换成what 原因是因为在强调句结构中,只有以下2种
(1)It is/was+强调内容+that+其它(如果强调的内容为事情,名词,介词短语,副词,或者从句,只能用that)
I met Tom in the street yesterday.
It was in the street that I met Tom yesterday.(强调地点状语)
是在街上我昨天遇见了TOM.
It was yesterday that I met Tom in the street.(强调时间状语)
是昨天我在街上遇见TOM.
(2)It is/was+强调内容+who+其它(如果强调内容是人,且作句子主语就可以用who)
It was I who met Tom in the street yesterday (强调主语)
中文意思:是我昨天在街上遇见TOM.
在强调句结构中,如果把It is/was...that/who 去掉后不影响句子结构,也不影响句子意思,句子原来意思依然是完整的.
特别备注,在强调句中it 不是形式主语啊,只起引导作用,没有实际意义的。
特别注意,没有以下结构。
It is/was +强调内容+(what)+其它结构=这个是错误的结构,请纠正过来.
注意和特殊疑问句加以区分
例如:
What made Tom so angry ?
这个特殊疑问句,如果强调主语就是下面结构
What was it that made Tom so angry?特别注意,WHAT 需要放在句首,不可以放在句中
It was (what) that made Tom so angry =错误结构
What was it that made Tom so angry ?=正确结构
现在明白了吗?如果明白了,请采纳,谢谢!
继续跟踪回答
Everyone agrees that it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
你的意思是把以上IT WAS...THAT 去掉换成WHAT 引导从句吗?,那么请问,你是想把WHAT 加在哪个地方啊?
(1)Everyone agree that what your quick-witted response in that emergency has led to this satisfactory outcome
(2)Everyone agree that your quick-witted response in that emergency what has led to this satisfactory outcome
请确认是否以上句子,如果不是,请你发给我,我在帮你分析,谢谢!
继续跟踪回答
【强调句型结构为】
Everyone agrees that it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory outcome.
【参考译文】大家/每个人都认同是他在那种紧急情况下的聪明机智反应导致了这个令人满意的结果.
【非强调句型结构为】
Everyone agrees that your quick-witted response in that emergency has led to this satisfactory outcome.
非强调句型语法结构分析为
主语:Everyone
谓语:agreed
引导宾语从句连接词:that
宾语从句:your quick-witted response in that emergency has led to this satisfactory outcome.
宾语从句主语:your quick-witted response
修饰宾语从句主语的后置定语:in that emergency
宾语从句谓语:has led to
宾语从句宾语:this satisfactory outcome
【非强调句型结构为】
【参考译文】大家/每个人都认同他在那种紧急情况下的聪明机智反应导致了这个令人满意的结果.
如果按照你的意思是把以上强调句型结构It was..that去掉换成what引导从句吗?,那么请问,你是想把what 加在哪个地方啊?
(1)Everyone agree that ①what your quick-witted response in that emergency has led to this satisfactory outcome .(what放在1这个地方时语法错误的句子)
(2)Everyone agree that your quick-witted response in that emergency ②what has led to this satisfactory outcome。(what放在2这个地方也是个语法错误的句子)
由于WHAT放在以上2个地方都是语法错误的句子,因此,请你准确告诉你,你要把what 放在哪里啊?放好后,把句子发给我
Everyone agrees that your quick-witted response in that emergency has led to this satisfactory outcome.
特别备注:以上句子属于语法非常完整,非常正确的句子,任何一个地方否不适合用what取代。请看以上我语法结构分析。
希望这次能让你明白,谢谢!
继续跟踪回答
如果按照你的意思,只把强调句型中THAT 换成WHAT,就是下面句子结构
Everyone agrees that it was your quick-witted response in that emergency what has led to this satisfactory outcome.
那么起宾语从句结构为下面
it was your quick-witted response in that emergency what has led to this satisfactory
根据what引导名词从句时候,what=the thing that ,来替换
it was your quick-witted response in that emergency the thing that has led to this satisfactory. 很显然这个句子是错误的,有2个先行词。
你现在明白了吗?如果不明白,请继续追问,如果明白了,请采纳,谢谢!另外我QQ 2248461201.可以加我QQ
继续跟踪解答,为了让你有一个彻底理解和明白,下面我再给你做进一步详细深入分析。希望你能明白.
it was your quick-witted response in that emergency what has led to this satisfactory
根据what引导名词从句时候,what=the thing that ,来替换
it was your quick-witted response in that emergency the thing that has led to this satisfactory. 很显然这个句子是错误的,这个句子有2先行词且中间没有任何连词。
请看下面详细分析:
That emergency the thing that has led to this satisfactory ,这个句子由有2个先行词,关系代词却只有一个that
(1)先行词that emergency
(2)先行词the thing
我想请问,关系代词到底是代替哪个先行词啊,1还是2呢?很明显,先行词为第2个,那么第1个都是多余的,需要去掉。
根据句子意思其先行词应该是your quick-witted response, 既然都有先行词,那么the thing就是多余的,因此不能填what 因为what 已经同时具有先行词+关系代词双重语法功能,其前不可以再有先行词出现。明白了吗?如果明白了,请采纳,谢谢!
标准的正确定语从句为下面
it was your quick-witted response in that emergency that has led to this satisfactory.
主语:It
系动词:was
表语:your quick-witted response
修饰表语的后置定语(1):in that emergency(介词短语充当后置定语)
修饰表语的定语从句(2):that has led to this satisfactory.(定语从句充当后置定语)
(特别备注:定语从句that作为关系代词,代替前面先行词your quick-witted response)
英语答疑网那个人 10:56:50
可现在主语从句并不在主语的结构上,而是用形式主语丢到了句尾,你要是还原结构就成:
what has led to this satisfactory was your quick-witted response .
陈才超级英语学霸俱乐部 10:56:59
that has led to this satisfactory这个定语从句是用来修饰正确先行词"your quick-witted response"; 关系代词that是代替先行词your quick-witted response的
陈才超级英语学霸俱乐部 10:57:59
反过来写,是可以的;是正确的
what has led to this satisfactory was your quick-witted response .=The thing that has led to this satisfactory was your quick-witted response